<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatives to Cut Public Funding For Political Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on international affairs, foreign policy, and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abandoned Stuff by Saskboy :: Conservatives Go for the Kill</title>
		<link>http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Abandoned Stuff by Saskboy :: Conservatives Go for the Kill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] other bloggers have noted, the Conservatives are looking to finish off several opposition parties including the Greens and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other bloggers have noted, the Conservatives are looking to finish off several opposition parties including the Greens and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Tim, 

Removing the caps wouldn&#039;t be my ideal scenario either. But in the context of removing public funding, I think it becomes a question of how poor we want our political parties to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, </p>
<p>Removing the caps wouldn&#8217;t be my ideal scenario either. But in the context of removing public funding, I think it becomes a question of how poor we want our political parties to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; &#8220;In this, the Conservatives aim to level a strategic blow to the Liberals&#8221;. Scott&#8217;s DiaTribes: My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</title>
		<link>http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; &#8220;In this, the Conservatives aim to level a strategic blow to the Liberals&#8221;. Scott&#8217;s DiaTribes: My personal opinions on social and political issues from a progressive standpoint.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] 2: I&#8217;d link to all the Progressive and Liberal blogs that are expressing outrage at this tactic, but there are so many of them I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll be able to list [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2: I&#8217;d link to all the Progressive and Liberal blogs that are expressing outrage at this tactic, but there are so many of them I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll be able to list [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Removing campaign funding combined with abuse of election spending
rules, Harper&#039;s in/out election spending fraud,  destroys the ability
of political parties to compete fairly. And will destroy our fair
democracy and replace it with a corrupted democracy which is hardly
democratic.

Sensible political interests which attract the majority of common
people will not win in Flaherty&#039;s, Harper&#039;s path to corruption.
Instead political interest which make the rich richer will win because
they pay for the Party election campaign expenses. If anything the
current system does not reward sensible political interests which
attract the majority of common people enough.

This is a path to economic and political corruption which will end in
Canada&#039;s destruction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Removing campaign funding combined with abuse of election spending<br />
rules, Harper&#8217;s in/out election spending fraud,  destroys the ability<br />
of political parties to compete fairly. And will destroy our fair<br />
democracy and replace it with a corrupted democracy which is hardly<br />
democratic.</p>
<p>Sensible political interests which attract the majority of common<br />
people will not win in Flaherty&#8217;s, Harper&#8217;s path to corruption.<br />
Instead political interest which make the rich richer will win because<br />
they pay for the Party election campaign expenses. If anything the<br />
current system does not reward sensible political interests which<br />
attract the majority of common people enough.</p>
<p>This is a path to economic and political corruption which will end in<br />
Canada&#8217;s destruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When the other guy fights dirty, you still have to roll with the punches &#171; More Notes From Underground</title>
		<link>http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/conservatives-to-cut-public-funding-for-political-parties/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>When the other guy fights dirty, you still have to roll with the punches &#171; More Notes From Underground</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deliberativedialogue.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] clusterfuck policies (that&#8217;s a highly technical economic term, kids) caused as a pretext to choke off funding to other parties. The Cons know that they have the cash to ride these cuts out - there finances look the best right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clusterfuck policies (that&#8217;s a highly technical economic term, kids) caused as a pretext to choke off funding to other parties. The Cons know that they have the cash to ride these cuts out &#8211; there finances look the best right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
